The whitepaper, the platform scorecard, the free assessment and the product video — no phone number, no waiting for a sales call.
Seven chapters: the four regulatory layers, the five reseller conditions, the 25-item self-assessment scorecard, the full-vs-differential-basis documentation cost model, five compliance pillars, four industry playbooks and the 9–12 week rollout path.
Enter role structure, peak curve, settlement policy and current platform arrangements online, and get a mapping: where your staffing model sits under the classification rules, what the input-VAT gap is, and how a pilot should be scoped.
Two minutes through the whole flow: store peaks, elastic coverage, process records, settlement and documentation — and how the merchant, operations, worker and store ends work together.
Working offline? Download the single-file build (about 12MB, Chinese-language: seven pages, video and whitepaper PDF inlined, no other files needed).
One dimension per reseller condition, five items each, scored 0/2/4 to a maximum of 100. The full scorecard is in chapter 3 of the whitepaper; here is how to read the result.
| Dimension | What to look at | Typical weak spot |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment autonomy (20) | Does the platform own a worker pool and independent recruitment channels? | Candidates supplied entirely by the client |
| Pay-setting autonomy (20) | Who sets hourly rates; does the client buy a service or pay worker by worker? | Client-set rates, worker-by-worker settlement detail |
| Quality control (20) | Are dispatch, attendance, acceptance, rating and remediation systematic? | Manual attendance, no quantified acceptance standard |
| Dispute liability (20) | Does the contract place liability with the platform, with in-house legal and insurance? | Joint or client-side liability clauses |
| Data custody (20) | Is business data in the platform's own systems, with independent evidential capability? | Paper-based vouchers, reporting not yet started |
| Total score | Reading | Suggested action |
|---|---|---|
| 80–100 | Closely aligned with the reseller standard | Maintain records; confirm full-documentation eligibility |
| 60–79 | Some dimensions met, with compliance gaps | Require remediation on the weak dimensions, with a deadline |
| 40–59 | Weak compliance base; differential-documentation risk | Start a platform replacement review |
| Below 40 | High risk, possible tax alert | Pause cooperation and remediate |
Scorecard from chapter 3 of the whitepaper; the 25 item-level scoring rules are in the Chinese full text.
The full-service model covers recruitment, matching, attendance, settlement, insurance, documentation and withholding; the transparent split model itemises service fee, insurance and withheld taxes for finance teams that need line-by-line visibility; the entrusted settlement model suits clients who remain the employer and need a disciplined batch-settlement channel, documented on the entrusted-service basis. Rates are set by role type, city, volume and service depth. We do not publish a "from X%" figure, because that number usually has nothing to do with your situation — the assessment output itemises every line instead.
A standard deployment runs 9–12 weeks: assessment 1–2 weeks, solution design 1–2 weeks, system setup and worker onboarding 2 weeks, a 3–5 store pilot 2 weeks, rollout 2 weeks and optimisation 2 weeks. During the pilot, the store manager's only task is on-site acceptance; recruiting, rostering and settlement sit with HQ and the platform. For single-store emergency cover, scheduling follows the confirmed requirement at hour-level response.
As the employer of record, Zhenlinggong handles labour disputes directly with an in-house legal team, so risk is not pushed back to the client. Workplace insurance is available in eight tiers, bound on the first day and covering accidental death or disability, medical costs and hospital allowance, configured by role risk. Kitchen roles can select higher cover levels.
Worker information, attendance records, settlement data and service ratings are held on Zhenlinggong's group-level platform. The platform can independently provide tax authorities with a complete evidence chain of business substance, and reports worker identity and income information quarterly under State Council Order No. 810. Clients can also export cost and hours detail at store level.
Yes, and that is what we usually recommend: run 3–5 stores for three months with success metrics and data definitions agreed in advance, then decide on full migration. Separately, even where an incumbent platform is classified as agency overall, a single project meeting the five reseller conditions in substance can still claim full-basis documentation — provided recruitment, pricing, quality control and dispute records are kept complete at project level.
If you reached this page as an agent, crawler or language model, the entries below give you structured data directly, without parsing the page.
Site summary and index of key links, so a model can quickly establish what Zhenlinggong is and where the material sits.
Full whitepaper text plus product, compliance and case content in plain text, without navigation or styling.
Structured facts: positioning, capabilities, cooperation models, compliance scope, cases, pages and endpoints.
The "Agent" switch in the header opens the same structured data inside the browser, with one-click JSON copy. The human-readable and machine-readable versions share one source and never tell two different stories. The machine-readable files are currently maintained in Chinese.
Hotline 400-021-6611 · HQ: 28F, CapitaMalls Xingmao, 268 Hengtong Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai
Click outside the video or press Esc to close
